- #Novabench scores explained windows 10
- #Novabench scores explained software
- #Novabench scores explained download
- #Novabench scores explained free
Timings for 4800K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 156.85 ms. Timings for 4608K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 144.07 ms. Timings for 4480K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 156.82 ms. Timings for 4096K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 116.24 ms. Timings for 4000K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 147.85 ms. Timings for 3840K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 122.18 ms. Timings for 3584K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 100.17 ms. Timings for 3360K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 179.91 ms. Timings for 3200K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 168.99 ms. Timings for 3072K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 362.37 ms. Timings for 2880K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 118.63 ms. Timings for 2688K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 87.25 ms. Timings for 2560K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 84.09 ms. Timings for 2400K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 358.48 ms. Timings for 2304K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 103.73 ms. Timings for 2240K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 130.66 ms. Timings for 2048K FFT length (2 cores, 1 worker): 9656.53 ms. Prime95 64-bit version 29.4, RdtscTiming=1 Package#0 (CPUVendor=GenuineIntel, CPUFamilyNumber=6, CPUModelNumber=76, CPUModel="Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU N3060 1.60GHz", CPUStepping=4) Machine#0 (total=1699980KB, Backend=Windows, hwlocVersion=1.11.9, ProcessName=prime95.exe) Machine topology as determined by hwloc library: Ĭompare your results to other computers at I started to uninstall McAfee as the benchmark was running. Her computer also had a McAfee antivirus as well as other Acer bloatware. Her results seem to indicate her laptop tablet being 4-5 times slower than mine. There is no bitcoin mining malware as far as I can tell – you have to press “Just Stress Testing” in the first window, then cancel the Torture Test offer and finally choose Benchmark under the Options menu.
#Novabench scores explained software
However, the software belongs to a “prime search” project and their aim is to use your CPU cycles in a distributed model to search for such numbers.
#Novabench scores explained download
I chose this one for the comparison as it seemed like a small download (from ) and it was portable. I skipped PCMark and 3DMark as, at 2GB and, respectively, 4GB, they are far too hefty for what I need and decided to go with Prime95 as that seemed to be the only one that is also portable.
#Novabench scores explained free
To my knowledge, the free benchmarking suites for Windows computers include Novabench, Prime 95, PCMark, 3DMark, SiSoft Sandra.
In my case, it ran for less than 2 minutes with a 4.4 system score. That is no longer shown in Windows 10, but it can be found by typing “ winsat formal -v -xml c:\winstatresults.xml” in an admin command prompt.
The quickest way to measure the performance of a Windows laptop is probably the “Windows Experience Index” which used to be made available in the “system” window, which one can bring up in several ways, such as pressing the Windows key + Pause/Break. I was curious to see how the two computers performed in comparison, so I asked her to run some benchmarking software while using it and I did the same. I have replaced the slow HDD with a fast SSD Samsung 850 EVO drive.Īs I helped a friend with some computer issues, I noticed that she had a very similar (but lighter) laptop (also Acer with 4GB RAM and same OS) with a less powerful N3060 processor.
#Novabench scores explained windows 10
I found that only Novabench is worth using.Īs you may recall from my article on buying this so-called new laptop, I have an Acer laptop that’s cheap, heavy and running an i3 processor with 4GB RAM and (mostly) Windows 10 Home. I recently had the opportunity to benchmark two very similar Acer computers, differing mostly in the kind of Intel processor they shared.
0 kommentar(er)
